Digging Deep with NEWSWEEK


Note: I first feel obliged to give my sketchy view on the metamorphosis of popular media. To skip to my bottom line, scroll down to the picture of Tina Brown, NEWSWEEK's editor. 

I've subscribed to several news weeklies over the years, but the one I've held onto the longest is NEWSWEEK. Since something like 1968, I've seen the magazine morph to fit the times. Back in the day, i.e., the 'sixties, NEWSWEEK – as with other such weeklies – maintained a stable of reporters searching out the stories of the day, gathering information on them, analyzing their data, and then reporting. Back then, we trusted the veracity of such reportage, much as we trusted Walter Cronkite, Peter Jennings, and others on TV.

Then, as life became more global, hence complex, readers seemed to ask for escape – hence a preoccupation with disco, Dennis Rodman, Donald Trump, and, even later, American Idol. NEWSWEEK and the other mags began to suffer losses in readership as magazine prices went up, corporate bean-counters ruled over journalism, and finally, the digital world of blogs and e-books began to threaten. For a while it became hard to tell NEWSWEEK from People or US.

By then, television had exploded from the three primary networks of the 'sixties to hundreds. That made it possible for news and politics junkies to select channels that fit their own biases, without much in the way of rational debate and analysis. NEWSWEEK had floundered into the world of FOX, MSNBC, CSPAN, Huffington Post, and CNN – and their separate variations on reality.


So where does this leave news weeklies – and news reportage in general? For the conscientious news consumer, it's possible now to graze from magazine to magazine, from channel to channel, blog to blog, sampling opinions. Now, it seems, readers and viewers must make up their own minds as to the truth of events – and that requires digging.

NEWSWEEK recently went through a radical change of structure and heart in order to escape going under financially. The magazine hired Tina Brown as its editor and merged with the blog-news entity, The Daily Beast. What has this meant to their reportage? They are now a microcosm of FOX, MSNBC, CSPAN, CNN, et. al. For example:

In the mag's March 28, 2011, issue, we have a personal essay on Japan and its recent catastrophe by Paul Theroux. Niall Ferguson is carving out the same sort of irascible territory as George Will, his essays lightly populated with facts obfuscated by opinion – the sort of column you read because you hate the man's playing fast and loose with facts.  An op-ed piece on Obama and No Child Left Behind. Perhaps the most incisive piece is on NPR's lack of political savvy in rescuing itself from congressional budget cuts. It's most intriguing piece is on a possible discovery on the ancient city of Atlantis. These, and a double handful of blog-like snippets, along with enough pop culture to hold the trendiest of us faithful, and NEWSWEEK is back in the game.

The common thread through these pieces is a marked lack of analysis. NEWSWEEK is now giving its readers a mosaic of the world, much as TV does. But unlike TV, where you can opt to say glued to FOX or MSNBC, a session with an issue of NEWSWEEK now requires the thoughtful reader to dig into these sometimes cranky, myopic pieces – and then to pan outward until the mosaic makes sense with the multitude of detail. 

This then is modern culture in a nutshell: seeing the big picture in the details. NEWSWEEK apparently understands this dynamic and, as such, has forced itself to be reborn from the ashes of the 'sixties.

4 Comments Add yours

  1. Frank Shyjka says:

    I like Newsweek. I’ve read it for more years than any other magazine I’ve subscribed to. But sadly it does require that I expressly choose not to do something else for the hour or so that I devote to it (usually over a solo lunch.) Recently in another magazine I read an article that was four pages long and noted to myself that it was longer than most pieces that I read. After that thought provoking insight, I no longer wonder that my college students find it nearly impossible to commit to an undistracted hour of study (when two or three are really required.)

  2. Gridley says:

    I think what I wrote here is symptomatic of what you’re talking about. With a plethora of choices, we tend to move about incessantly (in the mental sense), grabbing a bit of info here, some more there. Newsweeklies have always given us that, but now NEWSWEEK’s articles seem to have (or want) to shout to gain our attention over its other articles – and over blogs and other weeklies. It’s like today’s politics – loud and histrionic.
    I would imagine the challenge you face as a teacher is to get your students to question such noisy information fragments – not in a cynical, “gotcha” sense, but to stir up curiosity – to encourage looking deeper, to see how the disparate pieces fit together.
    We don’t live in an easy age – I often wonder how Socrates would approach the modern sophistry our information age engenders.

  3. Frank Shyjka says:

    Fast paced and flitting are the best descriptors. Old people always despair at the young and the world they inherit and create. Well, I don’t think it’s a hemlock moment. The world is now as it is and is the world our children think is normal. I took my two preteen grandchildren to 3D ‘Gnomeo and Juliet’ (aside – great movie for all ages) which I thought would impress them. Nope. That is just the new normal for them. I sincerely hope that reading stays important. I think our future in the world economy and culture will be strongly impacted by the next generation’s interest in and ability to read.

  4. Gridley says:

    We seem to be entering an era in which visual stimulation is predominating, and that makes it that much harder to keep the younger folks’ attention on the abstractions lying within and beneath the written word. The pragmatist in me urges those such as you to work with the helter-skelter mental dynamics – engender curiosity to, as I keep saying, look deeper.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s